UK time is: 12:46:34
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Report Abusive Comment


Thank you for the alert, before you submit it, PLEASE make sure it is a worthy alert.

We canít cater for whether you like another user or not, and please do bear in mind all our editors are in full time jobs and as an independent network, we are low on resources. Valid alerts are very welcome, please make sure your alert is valid!

If you require an answer, please make sure that your registered email is a current one. Please note we canít guarantee that we will respond to every alert but every alert will be looked at.

We thank you for your help in keeping Vital the leading place for sports fans views.

---------------------------------------


Please enter a category.
Comment:
A brave attempt at a very dry subject Couch, all I would add is the observation that the Directors deserve respect, but not hero worship. Who knows what motivates them? As I said on the last article they had the option of leaving their money in and pushing to bounce back, and not doing so was an error (compounded with the Laws signing) - I feel their shares would have been worth more doing this. I also feel that the return on many of these investments (especially Modus which I DO guess was at a rate built into the original agreement) far exceeded what investments into other areas would have returned over the same period (eg the stock market). So, respect, but could do better guys.

Posted By: CrosspoolClarets

Date/Time: 26/07/2011 20:26:00

Category:

Please add any additional comment you feel may be relevant